Shopping on line can be easy, simple and save you lots of money. It can also take a lot of your time, frustrate you, and result in unwanted purchases. Now the same can be said for regular high street shopping, but with the vast opportunity presented by the Internet it will pay you to spend a few minutes reading this and understanding how to better optimize your Planet shopping experience:

1. Compare - without doubt the biggest advantage that the Planet offers shoppers today is the ability to compare thousands of Planet at a time. This is a great thing, but not necessarily all the time! Too much can be daunting at times so take advantage of the great comparison sites and where possible let them do the hard work for you.

2. Research - if it has been said it will be on the internet. Ignorance is no longer a justifiable reason for buying the wrong thing. Take the time to research in detail everything that you could possible want to know about

3. Testimonials - don't know anybody that has bought a Planet? Wrong! If the Planet is good the internet will let you know. Use the Internet as a friend and get testimonials before you buy.

4. Questions - Got a question about Planet then search the Forums, FAQ's, Blogs etc. Don't be afraid to ask .....

5. Reputation - Never heard of the company selling Planet? Don't worry, no reason why you should know every company in the world, but you know someone that does! Use the internet to find out what people are saying about Planet and build up a picture of their reputation for sales, returns, customer service, delivery etc.

6. Returns - still worried that even after all of the above your Planet wont be what you want? Check out the returns policy. There is so much competition now that someone, somewhere is bound to offer the terms that you are comfortable with.

7. Feedback - happy with your Planet then let people know, after all you are depending on others people input in your buying decision, so why not give a little back.

8. Security - check for the yellow padlock on the Planet site before you buy, and the s after http:/ /i.e. https:// = a secure site

9. Contact - got a question about Planet, or want to leave a comment then check out the sites contact page. Reputable companies have them and respond.

10. Payment - ready to pay for your Planet, then use your credit card or PayPal! Be aware of companies that don't accept them, there may be genuine reasons but given the huge amount of choice you have when buying online there is no reason at all not to buy via credit card or PayPal.





A planet, as 2006 definition of planet by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), is a celestial body orbiting a star or Stellar evolution#Stellar remnants that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion in its core, and has cleared the neighbourhood of planetesimals.

The term planet is an ancient one, with ties to history, science, myth and religion. The planets were originally seen as a divine presence; as emissaries of the gods. Even today, many people continue to believe the astrology, although such a causation is Astrology and astronomy#Historical divergence. As scientific knowledge improved, the human perception of the planets changed over time, incorporating a number of disparate objects. Even now there is no uncontested definition of what a planet is. In 2006, the IAU officially adopted a resolution 2006 definition of planet within the Solar System. This definition has been both praised and criticised, and remains disputed by some scientists.

The planets were initially thought to orbit the Earth in circular motions; after the development of the telescope, the planets were determined to orbit the Sun, and their orbits were found to be elliptical. As observational tools improved, astronomers saw that, like Earth, the planets rotated around tilted axes and shared such features as ice-caps and seasons. Since the dawn of the space age, close observation by probes has found that Earth and the other planets share characteristics such as volcanism, hurricanes, tectonics and even hydrology. Since 1992, and the discovery of hundreds of extrasolar planets, scientists are beginning to observe similar features across the galaxy.

Under IAU definitions, there are eight planets in the Solar System (Mercury (planet), Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) and also at least three dwarf planets (Ceres (dwarf planet), Pluto, and Eris (dwarf planet)). Many of these planets are orbited by one or more natural satellite, which can be larger than small planets. There have also been more than two hundred planets discovered extrasolar planet. Planets are generally divided into two main types: large, low-density gas giants and smaller, rocky terrestrial planet. Dwarf planets, a separate category, can either be terrestrials or frozen ice dwarfs.

Etymology , after whom the Solar System's planets are named

In ancient times, astronomers noted how certain lights moved across the sky in relation to the other stars. The lights were first called "πλανήται" (planētai),See romanization of Greek for the transcription scheme. meaning "wanderers", by the ancient Greeks, and it is from this that the word "planet" was derived.

The Greeks gave the planets names: the farthest was called Phainon, the shiner, while below it was Phaethon, the bright one. The red planet was known as Pyroeis, "fiery", while the brightest was known as Phosphoros, the light bringer, and the fleeting final planet was called Stilbon, the gleamer. However, the Greeks also made each planet sacred to one of their pantheon of gods, the Twelve Olympians: Phainon was sacred to Cronus, the Titan (mythology) who fathered the Olympians, while Phaethon was sacred to Zeus, his son who deposed him as king. Ares, son of Zeus and god of war, was given dominion over Pyroeis, while Aphrodite, goddess of love, ruled over bright Phosphoros, and Hermes ruled over Stilbon.

The Greek practice of grafting of their gods' names onto the planets was almost certainly borrowed from the Babylonians, a contemporary civilisation in what is now Iraq, from whom they had begun to absorb astronomical learning, including constellations and the zodiac, by 600 BCE. The Babylonians named Phosphoros after their goddess of love, Ishtar, Pyroeis after their god of war, Nergal, and Phaethon after their chief god, Marduk. There are too many concordances between Greek and Babylonian naming conventions for them to have arisen separately. There does, however, appear to have been some confusion in translation. For instance, the Babylonian Nergal was a god of war, and the Greeks, seeing this aspect of Nergal's persona, identified him with Ares, their god of war. However, Nergal, unlike Ares, was also a god of the dead and a god of pestilence.Today, most people in the western world know the planets by names derived from the Twelve Olympians of gods; however, because of the influence of the Roman Empire and, later, the Catholic Church, they are known by their Roman (or Latin) names, rather than the Greek. The Romans, who, like the Greeks, were Indo-European mythology, shared with them a Roman mythology under different names but lacked the rich narrative traditions that Greek poetic culture had given Greek mythology. During the later period of the Roman Republic, Roman writers borrowed much of the Greek narratives and applied them to their own pantheon, to the point where they became virtually indistinguishable. When the Romans studied Greek astronomy, they gave the planets their own gods' names.To the Greeks and Romans, there were five known planets; each presumed to be Geocentric model according to the complex laws laid out by Claudius Ptolemy in the 2nd century. They were, in increasing order from Earth (according to Ptolemy): Mercury (planet) (Hermes), Venus (Aphrodite), Mars (Ares), Jupiter (Zeus), and Saturn (Cronus). Although strictly the term "planetai" referred only to those five objects, the term was often expanded to include the Sun and the Moon.{{cite web| title=Astra Planeta | publisher=Theoi Project | first=Aaron | last=Atsma | year=2007 | url=http://www.theoi.com/Titan/AstraPlaneta.html | accessdate=2007-02-25--> When subsequent planets were discovered in the 18th and 19th centuries, the naming practice was retained: [Uranus ([Ouranos) and [Neptune ([Poseidon). The Greeks still use their original names for the planets.

Some Ancient Rome, following a belief imported from Mesopotamia into Hellenistic Egypt,{{cite web| first=Bill | last=Arnett | year=2006 | title=Appendix 5: Planetary Linguistics | url=http://www.nineplanets.org/days.html | accessdate=2007-04-30--> believed that the seven gods after whom the planets were named took hourly shifts in looking after affairs on Earth. The order of shifts began with Jupiter and worked inwards; as a result, a list of which god had charge of the first hour in each day became Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn, i.e. the usual weekday name order. Sunday, Monday, and Saturday are straightforward translations of these Roman names. In English the other days were renamed after [Tyr, (Tuesday) [Woden (Wednesday), [Thor (Thursday), and [Frige (Friday), [Anglo-Saxon gods considered similar or equivalent to Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, and Venus respectively.

Since Earth was only generally accepted as a planet in the 17th century, there is no tradition of naming it after a god. Many of the Romance languages (including French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese), which are descended from Latin, retain the old Roman name of Terra or some variation thereof. However, the non-Romance languages use their own respective native words. Again, the Greeks retain their original name, Γή (Ge or Yi); the Germanic languages, including English, use a variation of an ancient Germanic word ertho, "ground," as can be seen in the English Earth, the German Erde, the Dutch Aarde, and the Scandinavian Jorde. The same is true for the Sun and the Moon, though they are no longer considered planets.

Some non-European cultures use their own planetary naming systems. India uses a naming system based on the Navagraha, which incorporates the seven traditional planets (Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn) and the ascending and descending lunar nodes Rahu and Ketu (mythology). China, and the countries of eastern Asia subject to Chinese cultural influence, such as Japan, Korea and Vietnam, use a naming system based on the Five elements (Chinese philosophy).

History

As scientific knowledge progressed, understanding of the term "planet" changed from something that moved across the sky (in relation to the fixed star), to a body that orbited the Earth (or that were believed to do so at the time). When the heliocentric model gained sway in the 16th century, it became accepted that a planet was actually something that directly orbited the Sun. Thus the Earth was itself a planet, while the Sun and Moon were not. At the end of the 17th century, when the first satellites of Saturn were discovered, the terms "planet" and "satellite" were at first used interchangeably, although "satellite" would gradually become more prevalent in the following century. Until the mid-19th century, any newly discovered object orbiting the Sun was listed with the planets by the scientific community, and the number of "planets" swelled rapidly towards the end of that period.

During the 1800s, astronomers began to realize most recent discoveries were unlike the traditional planets. They shared the same asteroid belt, between Mars and Jupiter, and had a far smaller mass. Bodies such as Ceres (dwarf planet), 2 Pallas, and 4 Vesta, which had been classed as planets for almost half a century, became classified with the new designation "asteroid." From this point, a "planet" came to be understood, in the absence of any formal definition, as any "large" body that orbited the Sun. There was no apparent need to create a set limit, as there was a dramatic size gap between the asteroids and the planets, and the spate of new discoveries seemed to have ended after the discovery of Neptune in 1846.

However, in the 20th century, Pluto was discovered. After initial observations led to the belief it was larger than Earth, the recently-created International Astronomical Union accepted the object as a planet. Further monitoring found the body was actually much smaller, but, as it was still larger than all known asteroids and seemingly did not exist within a larger population, it kept its status for some seventy years.{{cite web| first=Daniel W.E. | last=Green | year=2005 | url =http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/icq/ICQPluto.html | title =Is Pluto a giant comet? | publisher =Harvard-Smithosonian Center for Astrophysics | accessdate = 2007-05-11 -->

In the 1990s and early 2000s, there was a flood of discoveries of similar objects in the Kuiper belt of the Solar System. Like Ceres and the asteroids before it, Pluto was found to be just one small body in a population of thousands. A growing number of astronomers argued for it to be declassified as a planet, since many similar objects approaching its size were found. The discovery of Eris (dwarf planet), a more massive object widely publicised as the tenth planet, brought things to a head. The IAU set about creating the definition of planet, and eventually produced one in 2006. The number of planets dropped to the eight significantly larger bodies that had clearing the neighbourhood (Mercury (planet), Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus & Neptune), and a new class of dwarf planets was created, initially containing three objects (Ceres, Pluto and Eris).{{cite paper| last=Green | first=D.W.E. | version=Circular No. 8747 | publisher=Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, International Astronomical Union | date=September 13, [ | title=(134340) Pluto, (136199) Eris, and (136199) Eris I (Dysnomia) | url=http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/special/08747.pdf | format=PDF | accessdate=2007-05-11 -->

Definition and disputes With the discovery during the latter half of the 20th century of more objects within the Solar System and Extrasolar planets around other stars, disputes arose over what should constitute a planet. There was particular disagreement over whether an object should be considered a planet if it was part of a distinct population such as a Asteroid belt, or if it was large enough to generate energy by the thermonuclear fusion of deuterium.Image:EightTNOs.png|thumb|275px|The largest Trans-Neptunian objects that prompted the IAU's decision.
  • Earth
    • rect 646 1714 2142 1994 Earth
  • Eris and Dysnomia
    • circle 226 412 16 Dysnomia (moon)circle 350 626 197 Eris (dwarf planet)
  • Pluto and Charon
    • circle 1252 684 86 Charon (moon)circle 1038 632 188 Pluto
  • 2005 FY9
    • circle 1786 614 142 (136472) 2005 FY9
  • 2003 EL61
    • circle 2438 616 155 (136108) 2003 EL61
  • Sedna
    • circle 342 1305 137 90377 Sedna
  • Orcus
    • circle 1088 1305 114 90482 Orcus
  • Quaoar
    • circle 1784 1305 97 50000 Quaoar
  • Varuna
    • circle 2420 1305 58 20000 Varuna
  • Botopia


    • desc none
  • - setting this to "bottom-right" will display a (rather large) icon linking to the graphic, if desired


  • Notes:
  • Details on the new coding for clickable images is here: mw:Extension:ImageMap
  • While it may look strange, it's important to keep the codes for a particular system in order. The clickable coding treats the first object created in an area as the one on top.
  • Moons should be placed on "top" so that their smaller circles won't disappear "under" their respective primaries.
    • In 2003, The International Astronomical Union (IAU) Working Group on Extrasolar Planets made a position statement on the definition of a planet that incorporated a working definition:{{cite web| year=2001 | work=IAU | title=Working Group on Extrasolar Planets (WGESP) of the International Astronomical Union | url=http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/boss/definition.html | accessdate=2006-05-25-->

  • Objects with true masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium (currently calculated to be 13 times the mass of Jupiter for objects with the same natural abundance as the Sun) that orbit stars or stellar remnants are "planets" (no matter how they formed). The minimum mass and size required for an extrasolar object to be considered a planet should be the same as that used in our Solar System.
  • Substellar objects with true masses above the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are "brown dwarfs", no matter how they formed nor where they are located.
  • Free-floating objects in young star clusters with masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are not "planets", but are "sub-brown dwarfs" (or whatever name is most appropriate).


    • This definition has since been widely used by astronomers when publishing discoveries in journals,See for example the list of references for: {{cite web| author=Butler, R. P. ''et al'' | year=2006 | url=http://exoplanets.org/ | title=Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets | publisher =University of California and the Carnegie Institution | accessdate = 2007-07-23 --> although it remains a temporary yet effective, working definition until a more permanent one is formally adopted. It also did not address the dispute over the lower mass limit and steered clear of the controversy regarding objects within the [Solar System.

    This matter was finally addressed during the 2006 meeting of the IAU's General Assembly. After much debate and one failed proposal, the assembly voted to pass a resolution that 2006 definition of planet as:{{cite web| author=Staff | year=2006 | url =http://www.iau.org/iau0603.414.0.html | title =IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU resolution votes | publisher =IAU | accessdate = 2007-05-11 -->

    Under this definition, the Solar System is considered to have eight planets. Bodies which fulfill the first two conditions but not the third (such as Pluto and Eris) are classified as dwarf planets, providing they are not also natural satellites of other planets. Originally an IAU committee had proposed a definition that would have included a much larger number of planets as it did not include (c) as a criterion. After much discussion, it was decided via a vote that those bodies should instead be classified as dwarf planets.

    This definition is based in modern theories of planetary formation, in which planetary embryos initially clear their orbital neighborhood of other smaller objects. As described by astronomer Steven Soter:

    {{quotation|"The end product of secondary disk accretion is a small number of relatively large bodies (planets) in either non-intersecting or resonant orbits, which prevent collisions between them. Asteroids and comets, including KBOs, differ from planets in that they can collide with each other and with planets." -->

    In the aftermath of the IAU's 2006 vote, there has been criticism of the new definition,{{cite web| date=August 24, [ | first=Robert Roy | last=Britt | title=Pluto Demoted: No Longer a Planet in Highly Controversial Definition | work= Space.com | url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060824_planet_definition.html | accessdate=2006-08-24--> and some astronomers have even stated that they will not use it.{{cite web | date=August 31, [ | first=Robert Roy | last=Britt | title=Pluto: Down But Maybe Not Out | work= Space.com | url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060831_planet_definition.html | accessdate=2006-08-24--> Part of the dispute centres around the belief that point (c) (clearing its orbit) should not have been listed, and that those objects now categorised as dwarf planets should actually be part of a broader planetary definition. The next IAU [Academic conference is not until 2009, when modifications could be made to the definition, also possibly including extrasolar planets.

    Beyond the scientific community, Pluto has held a strong cultural significance for many in the general public considering its planetary status during most of the 20th century, in a similar way to Ceres and its kin in the 1800s. More recently, the discovery of Eris was widely reported in the mass media as the "tenth planet". The reclassification of all three objects as dwarf planets has attracted much media and public attention.{{cite news| first=Clara | last=Moskowitz | title=Scientist who found '10th planet' discusses downgrading of Pluto | publisher=Stanford news | date=October 18, [ | url=http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2006/october18/mbrown-101806.html | accessdate=2007-05-11 -->

    Formation It is not known with certainty how planets are formed. The prevailing theory is that they are formed during the collapse of a nebula into a thin disk of gas and dust. A protostar forms at the core, surrounded by a rotating protoplanetary disk. Through Accretion (astrophysics)—a process of sticky collision—dust particles in the disk steadily accumulate mass to form ever-larger bodies. Local concentrations of mass known as planetesimals form, and these accelerate the accretion process by drawing in additional material by their gravitational attraction. These concentrations become ever more dense until they collapse inward under gravity to form protoplanets. After a planet reaches a diameter larger than the Earth's moon, it begins to accumulate an extended atmosphere, greatly increasing the capture rate of the planetesimals by means of [Drag (physics).

    When the protostar has grown such that it ignites to form a star, the surviving disk is removed from the inside outward by photoevaporation, the solar wind, Poynting-Robertson effect and other effects.{{cite web| last = Dutkevitch | first = Diane | date =May 1995 | url =http://www.astro.umass.edu/theses/dianne/thesis.html | title =The Evolution of Dust in the Terrestrial Planet Region of Circumstellar Disks Around Young Stars | publisher =University of Massachusetts Amherst | accessdate = 2007-05-13 --> Thereafter there still may be many protoplanets orbiting the star or each other, but over time many will collide, either to form a single larger planet or release material for other larger protoplanets or planets to absorb.{{cite web | author = Kenton, S.; Bromley, B. | url = http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~kenyon/pf/dd/ | title = Dusty Rings & Icy Planet Formation | publisher = Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory | accessdate = 2006-07-25 --> {{cite news | first=Ron| last=Cowen | title=Planet Formation on the Fast Track | publisher=Science News | date=January 25, [ | url=http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20030125/bob9.asp | accessdate=2006-07-25 --> Those objects that have become massive enough will capture most matter in their orbital neighbourhoods to become planets. Meanwhile, protoplanets that have avoided collisions may become [natural satellites of planets through a process of gravitational capture, or remain in belts of other objects to become either [dwarf planets or [small solar system bodies.

    The energetic impacts of the smaller planetesimals (as well as radioactive decay) will heat up the growing planet, causing it to at least partially melt. The interior of the planet begins to differentiate by mass, developing a denser core. Smaller terrestrial planets lose most of their atmospheres because of this accretion, but the lost gases can be replaced by outgassing from the mantle and from the subsequent impact of comets.{{cite web, | url = http://home.tiac.net/~cri/1998/planet.html | title = The Standard Model of Planet Formation | accessdate = 2006-07-23 --> (Smaller planets will lose any atmosphere they gain through various [Atmospheric escape.)

    With the discovery and observation of planetary systems around stars other than our own, it is becoming possible to elaborate, revise or even replace this account. The level of metallicity—a astronomical term describing the abundance of isotopes with an atomic number greater than 2 (Helium)—is now believed to determine the likelihood that a star will have planets.{{cite news| author=Aguilar, D.; Pulliam, C. | date = January 6, [ | url = http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/press/pr0404.html | title = Lifeless Suns Dominated The Early Universe | publisher = Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics | accessdate = 2006-08-26 --> Hence it is thought less likely that a metal-poor, [population II star will possess a more substantial planetary system than a metal-rich [population I star.

    Within the Solar System

    According to the International Astronomical Union's current definitions there are eight planets in the Solar System. In increasing distance from the Sun, they are:
  • Mercury (planet)
  • Venus
  • Earth
  • Mars
  • Jupiter
  • Saturn
  • Uranus
  • Neptune


    • The larger bodies of the Solar System can be divided into categories based on their composition:

    {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"|+align=bottom style="text-align:left;"||- bgcolor=#ccccff! colspan=12 style="background:#dddddd;" | Planetary attributes|-!!style="font-size: smaller;"|Name!style="font-size: smaller;"|Equatorial
    diameter!style="font-size: smaller;"|Mass!style="font-size: smaller;"|Orbital
    radius (Astronomical Unit)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Orbital period
    (years)!style="font-size: smaller;"] (°)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Eccentricity (orbit)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Rotation period
    (days)!style="font-size: smaller;"]!style="font-size: smaller;"|Rings!style="font-size: smaller;"|Atmosphere| [Mercury (planet)| align="center" | 0.39| align="center" | 0.06| align="center" | 0.39| align="center" | 0.24| align="center" | 3.38| align="center" | 0.206| align="center" | 58.64| align="center" | —| align="center" | no| align="center" | minimal|-| Venus (planet)| align="center" | 0.95| align="center" | 0.82| align="center" | 0.72| align="center" | 0.62| align="center" | 3.86| align="center" | 0.007| align="center" | -243.02| align="center" | —| align="center" | no| align="center" | Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen|-| Earth (planet)| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | 7.25| align="center" | 0.017| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | Moon| align="center" | no| align="center" | N2, Oxygen|-| Mars (planet)| align="center" | 0.53| align="center" | 0.11| align="center" | 1.52| align="center" | 1.88| align="center" | 5.65| align="center" | 0.093| align="center" | 1.03| align="center" | Mars's natural satellites| align="center" | no| align="center" | CO2, N2|-! rowspan=4 style="background: #DDEEFF;" | Gas giants]| align="center" | 11.21| align="center" | 317.8| align="center" | 5.20| align="center" | 11.86| align="center" | 6.09| align="center" | 0.048| align="center" | 0.41| align="center" | Jupiter's natural satellites| align="center" | Rings of Jupiter| align="center" | Hydrogen, Helium|-| Saturn (planet)| align="center" | 9.41| align="center" | 95.2| align="center" | 9.54| align="center" | 29.46| align="center" | 5.51| align="center" | 0.054| align="center" | 0.43| align="center" | Saturn's natural satellites| align="center" | Rings of Saturn| align="center" | H2, He|-| Uranus (planet)| align="center" | 3.98| align="center" | 14.6| align="center" | 19.22| align="center" | 84.01| align="center" | 6.48| align="center" | 0.047| align="center" | -0.72| align="center" | Uranus's natural satellites| align="center" | Rings of Uranus| align="center" | H2, He|-| Neptune (planet)| align="center" | 3.81| align="center" | 17.2| align="center" | 30.06| align="center" | 164.8| align="center" | 6.43| align="center" | 0.009| align="center" | 0.67| align="center" | Neptune's natural satellites| align="center" | Rings of Neptune| align="center" | H2, He|-|colspan=12 style="background: #FFFFFF; border-right:1px solid white; border-bottom:1px solid white; border-left:1px solid white;"| Measured relative to the Earth. See Earth (planet) article for absolute values. |} Dwarf planets Before the 2006 redefinition of planet, several objects were proposed by astronomers, including at one stage by the International Astronomical Union, as planets. However in 2006 several of these objects were reclassified as dwarf planets, objects distinct from planets. Currently three dwarf planets in the Solar System are recognized by the IAU: Ceres (dwarf planet), Pluto and Eris (dwarf planet). Several other objects in both the asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt are under consideration, with as many as 50 that could eventually qualify. There may be as many as 200 that could be discovered once the Kuiper Belt has been fully explored. Dwarf planets share many of the same characteristics as planets, although notable differences remain—namely that they are not clearing the neighbourhood. Their attributes are:

    {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"|+align=bottom style="text-align:left;"||- bgcolor=#ccccff! colspan=12 style="background:#dddddd;" | Dwarf planetary attributes|-!!style="font-size: smaller;"|Name!style="font-size: smaller;"|Equatorial
    diameter!style="font-size: smaller;"|Mass!style="font-size: smaller;"|Orbital
    radius (Astronomical Unit)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Orbital period
    (years)!style="font-size: smaller;"] (°)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Eccentricity (orbit)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Rotation period
    (days)!style="font-size: smaller;"]!style="font-size: smaller;"|Rings!style="font-size: smaller;"|Atmosphere| [Ceres (dwarf planet)| align="center" | 0.08| align="center" | 0.0002| align="center" | 2.76| align="center" | 4.60| align="center" | 10.59| align="center" | 0.080| align="center" | 0.38| align="center" | —| align="center" | no| align="center" | none|-! rowspan=2 style="background: #DDEEFF;" | Ice dwarfs]| align="center" | 0.18| align="center" | 0.0022| align="center" | 39.48| align="center" | 248.09| align="center" | 17.14| align="center" | 0.249| align="center" | -6.39| align="center" | Pluto's natural satellites| align="center" | no| align="center" | temporary|-| Eris (dwarf planet)| align="center" | 0.19| align="center" | 0.0025| align="center" | 67.67| align="center" | ~557| align="center" | 44.19| align="center" | 0.442| align="center" | ~0.3| align="center" | Dysnomia (moon)| align="center" | no| align="center" | temporary|-|colspan=12 style="background: #FFFFFF; border-right:1px solid white; border-bottom:1px solid white; border-left:1px solid white;"| Measured relative to the Earth. |}By definition, all dwarf planets are members of larger populations. Ceres is the largest body in the asteroid belt, while Pluto is a member of the Kuiper belt and Eris is a member of the scattered disc. According to Michael E. Brown there may soon be over forty trans-Neptunian objects that qualify as dwarf planets under the IAU's recent definition.{{cite news| first=Brad | last=Amburn | title=Behind the Pluto Mission: An Interview with Project Leader Alan Stern | publisher=www.space.com | date=February 28, [ | url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060228_stern_interview.html | accessdate=2006-11-01 -->

    Beyond the Solar System Extrasolar planets Since the 1988 discovery of Gamma Cephei, a number of confirmed discoveries have been made of planets orbiting stars other than the Sun. Of the 239 extrasolar planets discovered by August 2007, most have masses which are comparable to or larger than Jupiter's. Exceptions include a number of planets discovered orbiting burned-out star remnants called pulsars, such as PSR B1257 plus 12,{{cite news| first=Barbara | last=Kennedy | title=Scientists reveal smallest extra-solar planet yet found | publisher=SpaceFlight Now | date=February 11, [ | url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0502/11planet/ | accessdate=2006-07-28 --> the planets orbiting the stars [Mu Arae, [55 Cancri and [GJ 436 which are approximately Neptune-sized,{{cite news | author=Santos, N.; Bouchy, F.; Vauclair, S.; Queloz, D.; Mayor, M. | title=Fourteen Times the Earth | publisher=ESO | date=August 25, [ | url=http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/pr-2004/pr-22-04.html | accessdate=2007-07-23 --> and a planetary system containing at least two planets orbiting [Gliese 876.{{cite web|title=Extrasolar planet Encyclopedia:Gliese 876|url=http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Gliese+876|accessdate=2007-09-10-->

    It is far from clear if the newly discovered large planets would resemble the gas giants in the Solar System or if they are of an entirely different type as yet unknown, like ammonia giants or carbon planets. In particular, some of the newly-discovered planets, known as hot Jupiters, orbit extremely close to their parent stars, in nearly circular orbits. They therefore receive much more solar radiation than the gas giants in the Solar System, which makes it questionable whether they are the same type of planet at all. There is also a class of hot Jupiters that orbit so close to their star that their atmospheres are slowly blown away in a comet-like tail: the Chthonian planets.

    More detailed observation of extrasolar planets will require a new generation of instruments, including space telescopes. Currently the CoRoT spacecraft is searching for stellar luminosity variations due to Astronomical transit. Several projects have also been proposed to create an array of space telescopes to search for extrasolar planets with masses comparable to the Earth. These include the proposed NASA's Kepler Mission, Terrestrial Planet Finder, and Space Interferometry Mission programs, the European Space Agency's Darwin (ESA), and the CNES' PEGASE.{{cite web| author=Staff | year=2004 | url =http://www.spacetoday.org/DeepSpace/Stars/Planets/PlanetFindingMissions.html | title =Future American and European Planet Finding Missions | publisher = Space Today Online | accessdate = 2007-07-23 --> The [New Worlds Mission is an occulting device that may work in conjunction with the [James Webb Space Telescope. However, funding for some of these projects remains uncertain. The frequency of occurrence of such terrestrial planets is one of the variables in the [Drake equation which estimates the number of [extraterrestrial intelligence that exist in our galaxy.{{cite news | last=Drake | first=Frank | title=The Drake Equation Revisited | publisher=Astrobiology Magazine | date=September 29, [ | url=http://www.astrobio.net/news/article610.html | accessdate=2007-07-23 -->

    Interstellar "planets" Several computer simulations of stellar and planetary system formation have suggested that some planemo would be ejected into interstellar space. Some scientists have argued that such objects found roaming in deep space should be classed as "planets". However, others have suggested that they could be low-mass stars.{{cite web ] working definition on extrasolar planets takes no position on the issue.

    For a brief time in 2006, astronomers believed they had found a binary system of such objects, Oph 162225-240515, which the discoverers described as "planemos", or "planetary mass objects". However, recent analysis{{cite web| title=The Wide Brown Dwarf Binary Oph 1622-2405 and Discovery of A Wide, Low Mass Binary in Ophiuchus (Oph 1623-2402): A New Class of Young Evaporating Wide Binaries? | url=http://fr.arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0608/0608574.pdf|author=Close, L. M. ''et al'' | year=2007 | accessdate=2007-04-30--> of the objects has determined that their masses are each greater than 13 Jupiter-masses, making the pair [brown dwarfs.{{cite web | url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planet_photo_040910.html | title=Likely First Photo of Planet Beyond the Solar System | first=Robert Roy | last=Britt| publisher=Space.com | date=September 10, [ | accessdate=2007-03-13-->

    ==Attributes==Although each planet has unique physical characteristics, a number of broad commonalities do exist between them. Some of these characteristics, such as rings or natural satellites, have only as yet been observed in planets in the Solar System, whilst others are also common to extrasolar planets.

    Dynamic characteristics Orbit . Note the elongation of Pluto's orbit in relation to Neptune's (orbital eccentricity), as well as its large angle to the ecliptic (inclination)All planets revolve around stars. In the Solar System, all the planets orbit in sync with the Sun's rotation. It is not yet known whether all extrasolar planets follow this pattern. The period of one revolution of a planet's orbit is known as its sidereal period or year.{{cite book| first=Charles Augustus | last=Young | year=1902 | title=Manual of Astronomy: A Text Book | publisher=Ginn & company | pages=pp. 324-7 --> A planet's year depends on its distance from the Sun; the farther a planet is from its star, not only the longer the distance it must travel, but also the slower its speed, as it is less affected by the star's gravity. Because no planet's orbit is perfectly circular, the distance of each varies over the course of its year. Its closest distance to its is called its [periastron ([perihelion in the Solar System), while its farthest distance from the star is called its [apastron ([aphelion in the Solar System). As a planet approaches periastron, its speed increases as the pull of its star's gravity strengthens; as it reaches apastron, its speed decreases.{{cite book | author=Dvorak, R.; Kurths, J.; Freistetter, F. | year=2005 | title=Chaos And Stability in Planetary Systems | publisher=Springer | location=New York | isbn=3540282084 -->

    Each planet's orbit is delineated by a set of orbital elements:



    accessdate=2007-09-08--> The points at which a planet crosses above and below the ecliptic are called its ascending node and descending nodes. Other orbital elements used to describe the orientation of a planet's orbit within our Solar System include the argument of periapsis and longitude of the ascending node.

    Axial tilt Planets also have varying degrees of axial tilt; they lie at an angle to the reference plane of the inclination. This causes the amount of light received by each hemisphere to vary over the course of its year; when the northern hemisphere points away from its star, the southern hemisphere points towards it, and vice versa. Each planet therefore possesses seasons; changes to the climate over the course of its year. The point at which each hemisphere is farthest or nearest from its star is known as its solstice. Each planet has two in the course of its orbit; when one hemisphere has its summer solstice, when its day is longest, the other has its winter solstice, when its day is shortest. Jupiter's axial tilt is very small, so its seasonal variation is minimal; Uranus, on the other hand, has an axial tilt so extreme it is virtually on its side, which means that its hemispheres are either perpetually in sunlight or perpetually in darkness around the time of its solstices.{{cite web, | url=http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/scitech/display.cfm?ST_ID=725 | title=Weather, Weather, Everywhere? | publisher=NASA | accessdate=2007-09-09 --> Among extrasolar planets, axial tilts are not known for certain, though most hot Jupiters are believed to possess negligible to no axial tilt, as a result of their proximity to their stars.{{cite web|title=Obliquity Tides on Hot Jupiters|author=Joshua N. Winn and Matthew J. Holman|work=The Astrophysical Journal|year=2005|url=http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/resolve?id=doi:10.1086/432834&erFrom=6796329409371401737Guest| accessdate=2007-09-08-->

    Rotation The planets also rotate around invisible axes through their centres. A planet's rotation period is known as its day. All the planets rotate in a counter-clockwise direction, except for Venus, which Retrograde and direct motion (Uranus is generally said to be rotating clockwise as well though because of its extreme axial tilt, it can be said to be rotating either clockwise or anti-clockwise, depending on whether one states it to be inclined 82° from the ecliptic in one direction, or 98° in the opposite direction). There is great variation in the length of day between the planets, with Venus taking 243 Earth days to rotate, and the gas giants only a few hours. The rotational periods of extrasolar planets is not known; however their close proximity to their stars means that hot Jupiters are tidal lock; their orbits are in sync with their rotations. This means they only ever show one face to their stars, with one side in perpetual day, the other in perpetual night.

    Orbital clearance The defining dynamic characteristic of a planet is that it has Cleared the neighborhood. In effect, it orbits its star in isolation, as opposed to sharing its orbit with a multitude of similar-sized objects. This characteristic was mandated as part of the International Astronomical Union's official 2006 definition of planet in August, 2006. This criterion excludes such planetary bodies as Pluto, Eris (dwarf planet) and Ceres (dwarf planet) from full-fledged planethood, making them instead dwarf planets. Although to date this criterion only applies to our Solar System, a number of young extrasolar systems have been found in which evidence suggests orbital clearing is taking place within their circumstellar discs.

    Physical characteristics Hydrostatic equilibrium A planet's defining physical characteristic is that it is large enough for the force of its own gravity to dominate over the electromagnetic forces binding its physical structure, leading to a state of hydrostatic equilibrium. This effectively means that all planets are spherical or spheroidal. Up to a certain size, an object can be irregular in shape, but beyond that point, which varies depending on the chemical makeup of the object, gravity begins to pull an object towards its own centre of mass until the object collapses into a sphere.

    Internal diffrentiation Every planet began its existence in an entirely fluid state; in early formation, the denser, heavier materials sank to the centre, leaving the lighter materials near the surface. Each therefore has a Planetary differentiation interior consisting of a dense planetary core surrounded by a Mantle (geology) which either is or was a fluid. The terrestrial planets are sealed within hard Crust (geology), but in the gas giants the mantle simply dissolves into the upper cloud layers. The terrestrial planets possess cores of magnetic elements such as iron and nickel, and mantles of silicates. Jupiter and Saturn are believed to possess cores of rock and metal surrounded by mantles of metallic hydrogen.{{cite book | first=Linda T. | last=Elkins-Tanton | year=2006 | title=Jupiter and Saturn | publisher=Chelsea House | location=New York | id=ISBN 0-8160-5196-8 --> [Uranus and [Neptune, which are smaller, possess rocky cores surrounded by mantles of [water, [ammonia, [methane and other [Ice#In planetary science. The fluid action within these planets' cores creates a [geodynamo that generates a [magnetic field.

    Atmospheres All of the planets have atmospheres as their large masses mean gravity is strong enough to keep gaseous particles close to the surface. The larger gas giants are massive enough to keep large amounts of the light gases Hydrogen and Helium close by, although these gases mostly float into space around the smaller planets. Earth's atmosphere is greatly different to the other planets because the various life processes that have transpired there have introduced massive amounts of free oxygen, while the atmosphere of Mercury has mostly, although not entirely, been blasted away by the solar wind.Hunten D.M., Shemansky D.E., Morgan T.H. (1988), The Mercury atmosphere, In: Mercury (A89-43751 19-91). University of Arizona Press, p. 562-612 Planetary atmospheres are affected by the varying degrees of energy received from either the Sun or their interiors, leading to the formation of dynamic weather systems such as hurricanes, (on Earth), planet-wide dust storms (on Mars) and Great Red Spots (on Jupiter). At least one extrasolar planet, HD 189733b, has been shown to possess such a weather system, similar to the Great Red Spot on Jupiter but twice as large.{{cite web, | author=Aguilar, D. A.; Pulliam, C. | url=http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/2007/pr200713.html | title=First Map of an Extrasolar Planet | work=Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics | accessdate=2007-08-15--> Hot Jupiters have been shown t



    A planet, as 2006 definition of planet by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), is a celestial body orbiting a star or Stellar evolution#Stellar remnants that is massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity, not massive enough to cause thermonuclear fusion in its core, and has cleared the neighbourhood of planetesimals.

    The term planet is an ancient one, with ties to history, science, myth and religion. The planets were originally seen as a divine presence; as emissaries of the gods. Even today, many people continue to believe the astrology, although such a causation is Astrology and astronomy#Historical divergence. As scientific knowledge improved, the human perception of the planets changed over time, incorporating a number of disparate objects. Even now there is no uncontested definition of what a planet is. In 2006, the IAU officially adopted a resolution 2006 definition of planet within the Solar System. This definition has been both praised and criticised, and remains disputed by some scientists.

    The planets were initially thought to orbit the Earth in circular motions; after the development of the telescope, the planets were determined to orbit the Sun, and their orbits were found to be elliptical. As observational tools improved, astronomers saw that, like Earth, the planets rotated around tilted axes and shared such features as ice-caps and seasons. Since the dawn of the space age, close observation by probes has found that Earth and the other planets share characteristics such as volcanism, hurricanes, tectonics and even hydrology. Since 1992, and the discovery of hundreds of extrasolar planets, scientists are beginning to observe similar features across the galaxy.

    Under IAU definitions, there are eight planets in the Solar System (Mercury (planet), Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune) and also at least three dwarf planets (Ceres (dwarf planet), Pluto, and Eris (dwarf planet)). Many of these planets are orbited by one or more natural satellite, which can be larger than small planets. There have also been more than two hundred planets discovered extrasolar planet. Planets are generally divided into two main types: large, low-density gas giants and smaller, rocky terrestrial planet. Dwarf planets, a separate category, can either be terrestrials or frozen ice dwarfs.

    Etymology , after whom the Solar System's planets are named

    In ancient times, astronomers noted how certain lights moved across the sky in relation to the other stars. The lights were first called "πλανήται" (planētai),See romanization of Greek for the transcription scheme. meaning "wanderers", by the ancient Greeks, and it is from this that the word "planet" was derived.

    The Greeks gave the planets names: the farthest was called Phainon, the shiner, while below it was Phaethon, the bright one. The red planet was known as Pyroeis, "fiery", while the brightest was known as Phosphoros, the light bringer, and the fleeting final planet was called Stilbon, the gleamer. However, the Greeks also made each planet sacred to one of their pantheon of gods, the Twelve Olympians: Phainon was sacred to Cronus, the Titan (mythology) who fathered the Olympians, while Phaethon was sacred to Zeus, his son who deposed him as king. Ares, son of Zeus and god of war, was given dominion over Pyroeis, while Aphrodite, goddess of love, ruled over bright Phosphoros, and Hermes ruled over Stilbon.

    The Greek practice of grafting of their gods' names onto the planets was almost certainly borrowed from the Babylonians, a contemporary civilisation in what is now Iraq, from whom they had begun to absorb astronomical learning, including constellations and the zodiac, by 600 BCE. The Babylonians named Phosphoros after their goddess of love, Ishtar, Pyroeis after their god of war, Nergal, and Phaethon after their chief god, Marduk. There are too many concordances between Greek and Babylonian naming conventions for them to have arisen separately. There does, however, appear to have been some confusion in translation. For instance, the Babylonian Nergal was a god of war, and the Greeks, seeing this aspect of Nergal's persona, identified him with Ares, their god of war. However, Nergal, unlike Ares, was also a god of the dead and a god of pestilence.Today, most people in the western world know the planets by names derived from the Twelve Olympians of gods; however, because of the influence of the Roman Empire and, later, the Catholic Church, they are known by their Roman (or Latin) names, rather than the Greek. The Romans, who, like the Greeks, were Indo-European mythology, shared with them a Roman mythology under different names but lacked the rich narrative traditions that Greek poetic culture had given Greek mythology. During the later period of the Roman Republic, Roman writers borrowed much of the Greek narratives and applied them to their own pantheon, to the point where they became virtually indistinguishable. When the Romans studied Greek astronomy, they gave the planets their own gods' names.To the Greeks and Romans, there were five known planets; each presumed to be Geocentric model according to the complex laws laid out by Claudius Ptolemy in the 2nd century. They were, in increasing order from Earth (according to Ptolemy): Mercury (planet) (Hermes), Venus (Aphrodite), Mars (Ares), Jupiter (Zeus), and Saturn (Cronus). Although strictly the term "planetai" referred only to those five objects, the term was often expanded to include the Sun and the Moon.{{cite web| title=Astra Planeta | publisher=Theoi Project | first=Aaron | last=Atsma | year=2007 | url=http://www.theoi.com/Titan/AstraPlaneta.html | accessdate=2007-02-25--> When subsequent planets were discovered in the 18th and 19th centuries, the naming practice was retained: [Uranus ([Ouranos) and [Neptune ([Poseidon). The Greeks still use their original names for the planets.

    Some Ancient Rome, following a belief imported from Mesopotamia into Hellenistic Egypt,{{cite web| first=Bill | last=Arnett | year=2006 | title=Appendix 5: Planetary Linguistics | url=http://www.nineplanets.org/days.html | accessdate=2007-04-30--> believed that the seven gods after whom the planets were named took hourly shifts in looking after affairs on Earth. The order of shifts began with Jupiter and worked inwards; as a result, a list of which god had charge of the first hour in each day became Sun, Moon, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, Venus, Saturn, i.e. the usual weekday name order. Sunday, Monday, and Saturday are straightforward translations of these Roman names. In English the other days were renamed after [Tyr, (Tuesday) [Woden (Wednesday), [Thor (Thursday), and [Frige (Friday), [Anglo-Saxon gods considered similar or equivalent to Mars, Mercury, Jupiter, and Venus respectively.

    Since Earth was only generally accepted as a planet in the 17th century, there is no tradition of naming it after a god. Many of the Romance languages (including French, Italian, Spanish and Portuguese), which are descended from Latin, retain the old Roman name of Terra or some variation thereof. However, the non-Romance languages use their own respective native words. Again, the Greeks retain their original name, Γή (Ge or Yi); the Germanic languages, including English, use a variation of an ancient Germanic word ertho, "ground," as can be seen in the English Earth, the German Erde, the Dutch Aarde, and the Scandinavian Jorde. The same is true for the Sun and the Moon, though they are no longer considered planets.

    Some non-European cultures use their own planetary naming systems. India uses a naming system based on the Navagraha, which incorporates the seven traditional planets (Sun, Moon, Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn) and the ascending and descending lunar nodes Rahu and Ketu (mythology). China, and the countries of eastern Asia subject to Chinese cultural influence, such as Japan, Korea and Vietnam, use a naming system based on the Five elements (Chinese philosophy).

    History

    As scientific knowledge progressed, understanding of the term "planet" changed from something that moved across the sky (in relation to the fixed star), to a body that orbited the Earth (or that were believed to do so at the time). When the heliocentric model gained sway in the 16th century, it became accepted that a planet was actually something that directly orbited the Sun. Thus the Earth was itself a planet, while the Sun and Moon were not. At the end of the 17th century, when the first satellites of Saturn were discovered, the terms "planet" and "satellite" were at first used interchangeably, although "satellite" would gradually become more prevalent in the following century. Until the mid-19th century, any newly discovered object orbiting the Sun was listed with the planets by the scientific community, and the number of "planets" swelled rapidly towards the end of that period.

    During the 1800s, astronomers began to realize most recent discoveries were unlike the traditional planets. They shared the same asteroid belt, between Mars and Jupiter, and had a far smaller mass. Bodies such as Ceres (dwarf planet), 2 Pallas, and 4 Vesta, which had been classed as planets for almost half a century, became classified with the new designation "asteroid." From this point, a "planet" came to be understood, in the absence of any formal definition, as any "large" body that orbited the Sun. There was no apparent need to create a set limit, as there was a dramatic size gap between the asteroids and the planets, and the spate of new discoveries seemed to have ended after the discovery of Neptune in 1846.

    However, in the 20th century, Pluto was discovered. After initial observations led to the belief it was larger than Earth, the recently-created International Astronomical Union accepted the object as a planet. Further monitoring found the body was actually much smaller, but, as it was still larger than all known asteroids and seemingly did not exist within a larger population, it kept its status for some seventy years.{{cite web| first=Daniel W.E. | last=Green | year=2005 | url =http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/icq/ICQPluto.html | title =Is Pluto a giant comet? | publisher =Harvard-Smithosonian Center for Astrophysics | accessdate = 2007-05-11 -->

    In the 1990s and early 2000s, there was a flood of discoveries of similar objects in the Kuiper belt of the Solar System. Like Ceres and the asteroids before it, Pluto was found to be just one small body in a population of thousands. A growing number of astronomers argued for it to be declassified as a planet, since many similar objects approaching its size were found. The discovery of Eris (dwarf planet), a more massive object widely publicised as the tenth planet, brought things to a head. The IAU set about creating the definition of planet, and eventually produced one in 2006. The number of planets dropped to the eight significantly larger bodies that had clearing the neighbourhood (Mercury (planet), Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus & Neptune), and a new class of dwarf planets was created, initially containing three objects (Ceres, Pluto and Eris).{{cite paper| last=Green | first=D.W.E. | version=Circular No. 8747 | publisher=Central Bureau for Astronomical Telegrams, International Astronomical Union | date=September 13, [ | title=(134340) Pluto, (136199) Eris, and (136199) Eris I (Dysnomia) | url=http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/iau/special/08747.pdf | format=PDF | accessdate=2007-05-11 -->

    Definition and disputes With the discovery during the latter half of the 20th century of more objects within the Solar System and Extrasolar planets around other stars, disputes arose over what should constitute a planet. There was particular disagreement over whether an object should be considered a planet if it was part of a distinct population such as a Asteroid belt, or if it was large enough to generate energy by the thermonuclear fusion of deuterium.Image:EightTNOs.png|thumb|275px|The largest Trans-Neptunian objects that prompted the IAU's decision.
  • Earth
    • rect 646 1714 2142 1994 Earth
  • Eris and Dysnomia
    • circle 226 412 16 Dysnomia (moon)circle 350 626 197 Eris (dwarf planet)
  • Pluto and Charon
    • circle 1252 684 86 Charon (moon)circle 1038 632 188 Pluto
  • 2005 FY9
    • circle 1786 614 142 (136472) 2005 FY9
  • 2003 EL61
    • circle 2438 616 155 (136108) 2003 EL61
  • Sedna
    • circle 342 1305 137 90377 Sedna
  • Orcus
    • circle 1088 1305 114 90482 Orcus
  • Quaoar
    • circle 1784 1305 97 50000 Quaoar
  • Varuna
    • circle 2420 1305 58 20000 Varuna
  • Botopia


    • desc none
  • - setting this to "bottom-right" will display a (rather large) icon linking to the graphic, if desired


  • Notes:
  • Details on the new coding for clickable images is here: mw:Extension:ImageMap
  • While it may look strange, it's important to keep the codes for a particular system in order. The clickable coding treats the first object created in an area as the one on top.
  • Moons should be placed on "top" so that their smaller circles won't disappear "under" their respective primaries.
    • In 2003, The International Astronomical Union (IAU) Working Group on Extrasolar Planets made a position statement on the definition of a planet that incorporated a working definition:{{cite web| year=2001 | work=IAU | title=Working Group on Extrasolar Planets (WGESP) of the International Astronomical Union | url=http://www.dtm.ciw.edu/boss/definition.html | accessdate=2006-05-25-->

  • Objects with true masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium (currently calculated to be 13 times the mass of Jupiter for objects with the same natural abundance as the Sun) that orbit stars or stellar remnants are "planets" (no matter how they formed). The minimum mass and size required for an extrasolar object to be considered a planet should be the same as that used in our Solar System.
  • Substellar objects with true masses above the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are "brown dwarfs", no matter how they formed nor where they are located.
  • Free-floating objects in young star clusters with masses below the limiting mass for thermonuclear fusion of deuterium are not "planets", but are "sub-brown dwarfs" (or whatever name is most appropriate).


    • This definition has since been widely used by astronomers when publishing discoveries in journals,See for example the list of references for: {{cite web| author=Butler, R. P. ''et al'' | year=2006 | url=http://exoplanets.org/ | title=Catalog of Nearby Exoplanets | publisher =University of California and the Carnegie Institution | accessdate = 2007-07-23 --> although it remains a temporary yet effective, working definition until a more permanent one is formally adopted. It also did not address the dispute over the lower mass limit and steered clear of the controversy regarding objects within the [Solar System.

    This matter was finally addressed during the 2006 meeting of the IAU's General Assembly. After much debate and one failed proposal, the assembly voted to pass a resolution that 2006 definition of planet as:{{cite web| author=Staff | year=2006 | url =http://www.iau.org/iau0603.414.0.html | title =IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU resolution votes | publisher =IAU | accessdate = 2007-05-11 -->

    Under this definition, the Solar System is considered to have eight planets. Bodies which fulfill the first two conditions but not the third (such as Pluto and Eris) are classified as dwarf planets, providing they are not also natural satellites of other planets. Originally an IAU committee had proposed a definition that would have included a much larger number of planets as it did not include (c) as a criterion. After much discussion, it was decided via a vote that those bodies should instead be classified as dwarf planets.

    This definition is based in modern theories of planetary formation, in which planetary embryos initially clear their orbital neighborhood of other smaller objects. As described by astronomer Steven Soter:

    {{quotation|"The end product of secondary disk accretion is a small number of relatively large bodies (planets) in either non-intersecting or resonant orbits, which prevent collisions between them. Asteroids and comets, including KBOs, differ from planets in that they can collide with each other and with planets." -->

    In the aftermath of the IAU's 2006 vote, there has been criticism of the new definition,{{cite web| date=August 24, [ | first=Robert Roy | last=Britt | title=Pluto Demoted: No Longer a Planet in Highly Controversial Definition | work= Space.com | url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060824_planet_definition.html | accessdate=2006-08-24--> and some astronomers have even stated that they will not use it.{{cite web | date=August 31, [ | first=Robert Roy | last=Britt | title=Pluto: Down But Maybe Not Out | work= Space.com | url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060831_planet_definition.html | accessdate=2006-08-24--> Part of the dispute centres around the belief that point (c) (clearing its orbit) should not have been listed, and that those objects now categorised as dwarf planets should actually be part of a broader planetary definition. The next IAU [Academic conference is not until 2009, when modifications could be made to the definition, also possibly including extrasolar planets.

    Beyond the scientific community, Pluto has held a strong cultural significance for many in the general public considering its planetary status during most of the 20th century, in a similar way to Ceres and its kin in the 1800s. More recently, the discovery of Eris was widely reported in the mass media as the "tenth planet". The reclassification of all three objects as dwarf planets has attracted much media and public attention.{{cite news| first=Clara | last=Moskowitz | title=Scientist who found '10th planet' discusses downgrading of Pluto | publisher=Stanford news | date=October 18, [ | url=http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2006/october18/mbrown-101806.html | accessdate=2007-05-11 -->

    Formation It is not known with certainty how planets are formed. The prevailing theory is that they are formed during the collapse of a nebula into a thin disk of gas and dust. A protostar forms at the core, surrounded by a rotating protoplanetary disk. Through Accretion (astrophysics)—a process of sticky collision—dust particles in the disk steadily accumulate mass to form ever-larger bodies. Local concentrations of mass known as planetesimals form, and these accelerate the accretion process by drawing in additional material by their gravitational attraction. These concentrations become ever more dense until they collapse inward under gravity to form protoplanets. After a planet reaches a diameter larger than the Earth's moon, it begins to accumulate an extended atmosphere, greatly increasing the capture rate of the planetesimals by means of [Drag (physics).

    When the protostar has grown such that it ignites to form a star, the surviving disk is removed from the inside outward by photoevaporation, the solar wind, Poynting-Robertson effect and other effects.{{cite web| last = Dutkevitch | first = Diane | date =May 1995 | url =http://www.astro.umass.edu/theses/dianne/thesis.html | title =The Evolution of Dust in the Terrestrial Planet Region of Circumstellar Disks Around Young Stars | publisher =University of Massachusetts Amherst | accessdate = 2007-05-13 --> Thereafter there still may be many protoplanets orbiting the star or each other, but over time many will collide, either to form a single larger planet or release material for other larger protoplanets or planets to absorb.{{cite web | author = Kenton, S.; Bromley, B. | url = http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/~kenyon/pf/dd/ | title = Dusty Rings & Icy Planet Formation | publisher = Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory | accessdate = 2006-07-25 --> {{cite news | first=Ron| last=Cowen | title=Planet Formation on the Fast Track | publisher=Science News | date=January 25, [ | url=http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20030125/bob9.asp | accessdate=2006-07-25 --> Those objects that have become massive enough will capture most matter in their orbital neighbourhoods to become planets. Meanwhile, protoplanets that have avoided collisions may become [natural satellites of planets through a process of gravitational capture, or remain in belts of other objects to become either [dwarf planets or [small solar system bodies.

    The energetic impacts of the smaller planetesimals (as well as radioactive decay) will heat up the growing planet, causing it to at least partially melt. The interior of the planet begins to differentiate by mass, developing a denser core. Smaller terrestrial planets lose most of their atmospheres because of this accretion, but the lost gases can be replaced by outgassing from the mantle and from the subsequent impact of comets.{{cite web, | url = http://home.tiac.net/~cri/1998/planet.html | title = The Standard Model of Planet Formation | accessdate = 2006-07-23 --> (Smaller planets will lose any atmosphere they gain through various [Atmospheric escape.)

    With the discovery and observation of planetary systems around stars other than our own, it is becoming possible to elaborate, revise or even replace this account. The level of metallicity—a astronomical term describing the abundance of isotopes with an atomic number greater than 2 (Helium)—is now believed to determine the likelihood that a star will have planets.{{cite news| author=Aguilar, D.; Pulliam, C. | date = January 6, [ | url = http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/press/pr0404.html | title = Lifeless Suns Dominated The Early Universe | publisher = Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics | accessdate = 2006-08-26 --> Hence it is thought less likely that a metal-poor, [population II star will possess a more substantial planetary system than a metal-rich [population I star.

    Within the Solar System

    According to the International Astronomical Union's current definitions there are eight planets in the Solar System. In increasing distance from the Sun, they are:
  • Mercury (planet)
  • Venus
  • Earth
  • Mars
  • Jupiter
  • Saturn
  • Uranus
  • Neptune


    • The larger bodies of the Solar System can be divided into categories based on their composition:

    {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"|+align=bottom style="text-align:left;"||- bgcolor=#ccccff! colspan=12 style="background:#dddddd;" | Planetary attributes|-!!style="font-size: smaller;"|Name!style="font-size: smaller;"|Equatorial
    diameter!style="font-size: smaller;"|Mass!style="font-size: smaller;"|Orbital
    radius (Astronomical Unit)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Orbital period
    (years)!style="font-size: smaller;"] (°)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Eccentricity (orbit)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Rotation period
    (days)!style="font-size: smaller;"]!style="font-size: smaller;"|Rings!style="font-size: smaller;"|Atmosphere| [Mercury (planet)| align="center" | 0.39| align="center" | 0.06| align="center" | 0.39| align="center" | 0.24| align="center" | 3.38| align="center" | 0.206| align="center" | 58.64| align="center" | —| align="center" | no| align="center" | minimal|-| Venus (planet)| align="center" | 0.95| align="center" | 0.82| align="center" | 0.72| align="center" | 0.62| align="center" | 3.86| align="center" | 0.007| align="center" | -243.02| align="center" | —| align="center" | no| align="center" | Carbon Dioxide, Nitrogen|-| Earth (planet)| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | 7.25| align="center" | 0.017| align="center" | 1.00| align="center" | Moon| align="center" | no| align="center" | N2, Oxygen|-| Mars (planet)| align="center" | 0.53| align="center" | 0.11| align="center" | 1.52| align="center" | 1.88| align="center" | 5.65| align="center" | 0.093| align="center" | 1.03| align="center" | Mars's natural satellites| align="center" | no| align="center" | CO2, N2|-! rowspan=4 style="background: #DDEEFF;" | Gas giants]| align="center" | 11.21| align="center" | 317.8| align="center" | 5.20| align="center" | 11.86| align="center" | 6.09| align="center" | 0.048| align="center" | 0.41| align="center" | Jupiter's natural satellites| align="center" | Rings of Jupiter| align="center" | Hydrogen, Helium|-| Saturn (planet)| align="center" | 9.41| align="center" | 95.2| align="center" | 9.54| align="center" | 29.46| align="center" | 5.51| align="center" | 0.054| align="center" | 0.43| align="center" | Saturn's natural satellites| align="center" | Rings of Saturn| align="center" | H2, He|-| Uranus (planet)| align="center" | 3.98| align="center" | 14.6| align="center" | 19.22| align="center" | 84.01| align="center" | 6.48| align="center" | 0.047| align="center" | -0.72| align="center" | Uranus's natural satellites| align="center" | Rings of Uranus| align="center" | H2, He|-| Neptune (planet)| align="center" | 3.81| align="center" | 17.2| align="center" | 30.06| align="center" | 164.8| align="center" | 6.43| align="center" | 0.009| align="center" | 0.67| align="center" | Neptune's natural satellites| align="center" | Rings of Neptune| align="center" | H2, He|-|colspan=12 style="background: #FFFFFF; border-right:1px solid white; border-bottom:1px solid white; border-left:1px solid white;"| Measured relative to the Earth. See Earth (planet) article for absolute values. |} Dwarf planets Before the 2006 redefinition of planet, several objects were proposed by astronomers, including at one stage by the International Astronomical Union, as planets. However in 2006 several of these objects were reclassified as dwarf planets, objects distinct from planets. Currently three dwarf planets in the Solar System are recognized by the IAU: Ceres (dwarf planet), Pluto and Eris (dwarf planet). Several other objects in both the asteroid belt and the Kuiper belt are under consideration, with as many as 50 that could eventually qualify. There may be as many as 200 that could be discovered once the Kuiper Belt has been fully explored. Dwarf planets share many of the same characteristics as planets, although notable differences remain—namely that they are not clearing the neighbourhood. Their attributes are:

    {| class="wikitable" style="margin: 1em auto 1em auto"|+align=bottom style="text-align:left;"||- bgcolor=#ccccff! colspan=12 style="background:#dddddd;" | Dwarf planetary attributes|-!!style="font-size: smaller;"|Name!style="font-size: smaller;"|Equatorial
    diameter!style="font-size: smaller;"|Mass!style="font-size: smaller;"|Orbital
    radius (Astronomical Unit)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Orbital period
    (years)!style="font-size: smaller;"] (°)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Eccentricity (orbit)!style="font-size: smaller;"|Rotation period
    (days)!style="font-size: smaller;"]!style="font-size: smaller;"|Rings!style="font-size: smaller;"|Atmosphere| [Ceres (dwarf planet)| align="center" | 0.08| align="center" | 0.0002| align="center" | 2.76| align="center" | 4.60| align="center" | 10.59| align="center" | 0.080| align="center" | 0.38| align="center" | —| align="center" | no| align="center" | none|-! rowspan=2 style="background: #DDEEFF;" | Ice dwarfs]| align="center" | 0.18| align="center" | 0.0022| align="center" | 39.48| align="center" | 248.09| align="center" | 17.14| align="center" | 0.249| align="center" | -6.39| align="center" | Pluto's natural satellites| align="center" | no| align="center" | temporary|-| Eris (dwarf planet)| align="center" | 0.19| align="center" | 0.0025| align="center" | 67.67| align="center" | ~557| align="center" | 44.19| align="center" | 0.442| align="center" | ~0.3| align="center" | Dysnomia (moon)| align="center" | no| align="center" | temporary|-|colspan=12 style="background: #FFFFFF; border-right:1px solid white; border-bottom:1px solid white; border-left:1px solid white;"| Measured relative to the Earth. |}By definition, all dwarf planets are members of larger populations. Ceres is the largest body in the asteroid belt, while Pluto is a member of the Kuiper belt and Eris is a member of the scattered disc. According to Michael E. Brown there may soon be over forty trans-Neptunian objects that qualify as dwarf planets under the IAU's recent definition.{{cite news| first=Brad | last=Amburn | title=Behind the Pluto Mission: An Interview with Project Leader Alan Stern | publisher=www.space.com | date=February 28, [ | url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/060228_stern_interview.html | accessdate=2006-11-01 -->

    Beyond the Solar System Extrasolar planets Since the 1988 discovery of Gamma Cephei, a number of confirmed discoveries have been made of planets orbiting stars other than the Sun. Of the 239 extrasolar planets discovered by August 2007, most have masses which are comparable to or larger than Jupiter's. Exceptions include a number of planets discovered orbiting burned-out star remnants called pulsars, such as PSR B1257 plus 12,{{cite news| first=Barbara | last=Kennedy | title=Scientists reveal smallest extra-solar planet yet found | publisher=SpaceFlight Now | date=February 11, [ | url=http://www.spaceflightnow.com/news/n0502/11planet/ | accessdate=2006-07-28 --> the planets orbiting the stars [Mu Arae, [55 Cancri and [GJ 436 which are approximately Neptune-sized,{{cite news | author=Santos, N.; Bouchy, F.; Vauclair, S.; Queloz, D.; Mayor, M. | title=Fourteen Times the Earth | publisher=ESO | date=August 25, [ | url=http://www.eso.org/public/outreach/press-rel/pr-2004/pr-22-04.html | accessdate=2007-07-23 --> and a planetary system containing at least two planets orbiting [Gliese 876.{{cite web|title=Extrasolar planet Encyclopedia:Gliese 876|url=http://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=Gliese+876|accessdate=2007-09-10-->

    It is far from clear if the newly discovered large planets would resemble the gas giants in the Solar System or if they are of an entirely different type as yet unknown, like ammonia giants or carbon planets. In particular, some of the newly-discovered planets, known as hot Jupiters, orbit extremely close to their parent stars, in nearly circular orbits. They therefore receive much more solar radiation than the gas giants in the Solar System, which makes it questionable whether they are the same type of planet at all. There is also a class of hot Jupiters that orbit so close to their star that their atmospheres are slowly blown away in a comet-like tail: the Chthonian planets.

    More detailed observation of extrasolar planets will require a new generation of instruments, including space telescopes. Currently the CoRoT spacecraft is searching for stellar luminosity variations due to Astronomical transit. Several projects have also been proposed to create an array of space telescopes to search for extrasolar planets with masses comparable to the Earth. These include the proposed NASA's Kepler Mission, Terrestrial Planet Finder, and Space Interferometry Mission programs, the European Space Agency's Darwin (ESA), and the CNES' PEGASE.{{cite web| author=Staff | year=2004 | url =http://www.spacetoday.org/DeepSpace/Stars/Planets/PlanetFindingMissions.html | title =Future American and European Planet Finding Missions | publisher = Space Today Online | accessdate = 2007-07-23 --> The [New Worlds Mission is an occulting device that may work in conjunction with the [James Webb Space Telescope. However, funding for some of these projects remains uncertain. The frequency of occurrence of such terrestrial planets is one of the variables in the [Drake equation which estimates the number of [extraterrestrial intelligence that exist in our galaxy.{{cite news | last=Drake | first=Frank | title=The Drake Equation Revisited | publisher=Astrobiology Magazine | date=September 29, [ | url=http://www.astrobio.net/news/article610.html | accessdate=2007-07-23 -->

    Interstellar "planets" Several computer simulations of stellar and planetary system formation have suggested that some planemo would be ejected into interstellar space. Some scientists have argued that such objects found roaming in deep space should be classed as "planets". However, others have suggested that they could be low-mass stars.{{cite web ] working definition on extrasolar planets takes no position on the issue.

    For a brief time in 2006, astronomers believed they had found a binary system of such objects, Oph 162225-240515, which the discoverers described as "planemos", or "planetary mass objects". However, recent analysis{{cite web| title=The Wide Brown Dwarf Binary Oph 1622-2405 and Discovery of A Wide, Low Mass Binary in Ophiuchus (Oph 1623-2402): A New Class of Young Evaporating Wide Binaries? | url=http://fr.arxiv.org/PS_cache/astro-ph/pdf/0608/0608574.pdf|author=Close, L. M. ''et al'' | year=2007 | accessdate=2007-04-30--> of the objects has determined that their masses are each greater than 13 Jupiter-masses, making the pair [brown dwarfs.{{cite web | url=http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/planet_photo_040910.html | title=Likely First Photo of Planet Beyond the Solar System | first=Robert Roy | last=Britt| publisher=Space.com | date=September 10, [ | accessdate=2007-03-13-->

    ==Attributes==Although each planet has unique physical characteristics, a number of broad commonalities do exist between them. Some of these characteristics, such as rings or natural satellites, have only as yet been observed in planets in the Solar System, whilst others are also common to extrasolar planets.

    Dynamic characteristics Orbit . Note the elongation of Pluto's orbit in relation to Neptune's (orbital eccentricity), as well as its large angle to the ecliptic (inclination)All planets revolve around stars. In the Solar System, all the planets orbit in sync with the Sun's rotation. It is not yet known whether all extrasolar planets follow this pattern. The period of one revolution of a planet's orbit is known as its sidereal period or year.{{cite book| first=Charles Augustus | last=Young | year=1902 | title=Manual of Astronomy: A Text Book | publisher=Ginn & company | pages=pp. 324-7 --> A planet's year depends on its distance from the Sun; the farther a planet is from its star, not only the longer the distance it must travel, but also the slower its speed, as it is less affected by the star's gravity. Because no planet's orbit is perfectly circular, the distance of each varies over the course of its year. Its closest distance to its is called its [periastron ([perihelion in the Solar System), while its farthest distance from the star is called its [apastron ([aphelion in the Solar System). As a planet approaches periastron, its speed increases as the pull of its star's gravity strengthens; as it reaches apastron, its speed decreases.{{cite book | author=Dvorak, R.; Kurths, J.; Freistetter, F. | year=2005 | title=Chaos And Stability in Planetary Systems | publisher=Springer | location=New York | isbn=3540282084 -->

    Each planet's orbit is delineated by a set of orbital elements:



    accessdate=2007-09-08--> The points at which a planet crosses above and below the ecliptic are called its ascending node and descending nodes. Other orbital elements used to describe the orientation of a planet's orbit within our Solar System include the argument of periapsis and longitude of the ascending node.

    Axial tilt Planets also have varying degrees of axial tilt; they lie at an angle to the reference plane of the inclination. This causes the amount of light received by each hemisphere to vary over the course of its year; when the northern hemisphere points away from its star, the southern hemisphere points towards it, and vice versa. Each planet therefore possesses seasons; changes to the climate over the course of its year. The point at which each hemisphere is farthest or nearest from its star is known as its solstice. Each planet has two in the course of its orbit; when one hemisphere has its summer solstice, when its day is longest, the other has its winter solstice, when its day is shortest. Jupiter's axial tilt is very small, so its seasonal variation is minimal; Uranus, on the other hand, has an axial tilt so extreme it is virtually on its side, which means that its hemispheres are either perpetually in sunlight or perpetually in darkness around the time of its solstices.{{cite web, | url=http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/scitech/display.cfm?ST_ID=725 | title=Weather, Weather, Everywhere? | publisher=NASA | accessdate=2007-09-09 --> Among extrasolar planets, axial tilts are not known for certain, though most hot Jupiters are believed to possess negligible to no axial tilt, as a result of their proximity to their stars.{{cite web|title=Obliquity Tides on Hot Jupiters|author=Joshua N. Winn and Matthew J. Holman|work=The Astrophysical Journal|year=2005|url=http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/cgi-bin/resolve?id=doi:10.1086/432834&erFrom=6796329409371401737Guest| accessdate=2007-09-08-->

    Rotation The planets also rotate around invisible axes through their centres. A planet's rotation period is known as its day. All the planets rotate in a counter-clockwise direction, except for Venus, which Retrograde and direct motion (Uranus is generally said to be rotating clockwise as well though because of its extreme axial tilt, it can be said to be rotating either clockwise or anti-clockwise, depending on whether one states it to be inclined 82° from the ecliptic in one direction, or 98° in the opposite direction). There is great variation in the length of day between the planets, with Venus taking 243 Earth days to rotate, and the gas giants only a few hours. The rotational periods of extrasolar planets is not known; however their close proximity to their stars means that hot Jupiters are tidal lock; their orbits are in sync with their rotations. This means they only ever show one face to their stars, with one side in perpetual day, the other in perpetual night.

    Orbital clearance The defining dynamic characteristic of a planet is that it has Cleared the neighborhood. In effect, it orbits its star in isolation, as opposed to sharing its orbit with a multitude of similar-sized objects. This characteristic was mandated as part of the International Astronomical Union's official 2006 definition of planet in August, 2006. This criterion excludes such planetary bodies as Pluto, Eris (dwarf planet) and Ceres (dwarf planet) from full-fledged planethood, making them instead dwarf planets. Although to date this criterion only applies to our Solar System, a number of young extrasolar systems have been found in which evidence suggests orbital clearing is taking place within their circumstellar discs.

    Physical characteristics Hydrostatic equilibrium A planet's defining physical characteristic is that it is large enough for the force of its own gravity to dominate over the electromagnetic forces binding its physical structure, leading to a state of hydrostatic equilibrium. This effectively means that all planets are spherical or spheroidal. Up to a certain size, an object can be irregular in shape, but beyond that point, which varies depending on the chemical makeup of the object, gravity begins to pull an object towards its own centre of mass until the object collapses into a sphere.

    Internal diffrentiation Every planet began its existence in an entirely fluid state; in early formation, the denser, heavier materials sank to the centre, leaving the lighter materials near the surface. Each therefore has a Planetary differentiation interior consisting of a dense planetary core surrounded by a Mantle (geology) which either is or was a fluid. The terrestrial planets are sealed within hard Crust (geology), but in the gas giants the mantle simply dissolves into the upper cloud layers. The terrestrial planets possess cores of magnetic elements such as iron and nickel, and mantles of silicates. Jupiter and Saturn are believed to possess cores of rock and metal surrounded by mantles of metallic hydrogen.{{cite book | first=Linda T. | last=Elkins-Tanton | year=2006 | title=Jupiter and Saturn | publisher=Chelsea House | location=New York | id=ISBN 0-8160-5196-8 --> [Uranus and [Neptune, which are smaller, possess rocky cores surrounded by mantles of [water, [ammonia, [methane and other [Ice#In planetary science. The fluid action within these planets' cores creates a [geodynamo that generates a [magnetic field.

    Atmospheres All of the planets have atmospheres as their large masses mean gravity is strong enough to keep gaseous particles close to the surface. The larger gas giants are massive enough to keep large amounts of the light gases Hydrogen and Helium close by, although these gases mostly float into space around the smaller planets. Earth's atmosphere is greatly different to the other planets because the various life processes that have transpired there have introduced massive amounts of free oxygen, while the atmosphere of Mercury has mostly, although not entirely, been blasted away by the solar wind.Hunten D.M., Shemansky D.E., Morgan T.H. (1988), The Mercury atmosphere, In: Mercury (A89-43751 19-91). University of Arizona Press, p. 562-612 Planetary atmospheres are affected by the varying degrees of energy received from either the Sun or their interiors, leading to the formation of dynamic weather systems such as hurricanes, (on Earth), planet-wide dust storms (on Mars) and Great Red Spots (on Jupiter). At least one extrasolar planet, HD 189733b, has been shown to possess such a weather system, similar to the Great Red Spot on Jupiter but twice as large.{{cite web, | author=Aguilar, D. A.; Pulliam, C. | url=http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/press/2007/pr200713.html | title=First Map of an Extrasolar Planet | work=Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics | accessdate=2007-08-15--> Hot Jupiters have been shown t

    BBC - Science & Nature - Planet Earth
    An interactive journey around the planet brings stunning video and images to your desktop. UK viewers can enjoy clips from Planet Earth and other natural history series.

    BBC - Science & Nature - Planet Earth
    Landmark TV series that tells the story of the most spectacular natural events on Earth. ... Experience Earth as never before with groundbreaking footage of our planet and its ...

    Flash Intro - Womens Clothes - Planet
    Browse through Planet's high quality Women's Clothing collections and choose from a versatile range of stylish women's shoes, dresses, trousers, jackets, skirts, tops and ...

    WWF-UK: One Planet Future campaign
    If everyone in the world lived as we do in the UK, we would need three planets to support us. Read more about WWFs vision for A One Planet Future.

    Planet Ice
    Details of rinks in Basingstoke, Coventry, Isle of Wight, Milton Keynes and Peterborough. Includes hours, clubs, locations, tuition and party bookings.

    Planet Rock, the UK's Classic Rock DAB Digital Radio Station.
    Planet Rock plays the best classic rock music from the likes of Led Zeppelin, AC/DC, Pink Floyd, deep purple and Black Sabbath with presenters such as Rick Wakeman, Alice Cooper ...

    Planet ARKive
    The Planet ARKive website has been upgraded and incorporated into the ARKive Education website.

    PLANET PLATFORMS ::
    get up on the roof with safepost™ an intelligent decision by rolls royce. planet platforms for white air festival . planet eastern goes for gold

    Planet Protectors

    Welcome to PLANET Technology Corporation.
    TEL:886-2-2219-9518　FAX:886-2-2219-9528　E-mail: sales@planet.com.tw ©PLANET Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.

     

    Planet



     
    Copyright © 2008 Hintcenter.com - All rights reserved.
    Home | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
    All Trademarks belong to their repective owners. Many aspects of this page are used under
    commercial commons license from Yahoo!